Monday, December 17, 2018
'The Shame of Family Films\r'
'The The ignominy of Family Films In the term ââ¬Å"The Shame of Family Filmsââ¬Â the author, Julia Baird, discusses how there is a lack of fe mannish heroines or fe anthropoid important book of factss in peasantrenââ¬â¢s movies. She thus goes on to imbibe a study d wiz by Stacy smith and Marc Choueiti at the Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism at the University of Southern California, who analyzed 122 family films, including the fifty top-grossing ones during the years 2006 to 2009, ranging from G to PG-13. In the study they found that 29. 2 sh atomic number 18 of the casefuls were female.They also found that one in quadruple characters were portrayed ââ¬Å"sexy, tight, or alluring attireââ¬Â, which was compared to one in twenty-five male characters. The author then went on discuss how many women were found rat all these childrenââ¬â¢s movies. She referred to a study called The Annenburg conceive that was commissioned by Geena Davis Institut e and it found that the voice of animators who were female, the piece of women who form crowd scenes in family films, and the percentage of female narrators were all seventeen percent.\r\nRelated clause: Shame is Worth a Try SummaryThis article make me theorize back to the movies I watched as a child and I realized that a lot of those movies were also sexist. Many of the movies were and are made with traditional sex activity roles set in them. They portrayed a feeble main female character that was saved by a strong male character or a main character was a very strong minded male who was assisted by a female sidekick. I agree with Baird that there is a lack of heroines in childrenââ¬â¢s movies. Many children may continue to survey the traditional grammatical sexuality roles because of the movies they watch.Boys pull up stakes think that they are suppose to be strong, powerful, and intelligent and the girls will think that they have to be weak and that even if they are stron g and have power, a male will always have more power. I would standardised to see more female characters in childrenââ¬â¢s movies not abiding by the traditional gender roles because I think little girls should know that they back tooth give boys a run for their money when it comes to comely strong and powerful. I grew up with the traditional gender roles and I hated that I had to.I didnââ¬â¢t same(p) when my brothers and I would play ââ¬Å" getââ¬â¢s mathematical functionââ¬Â or ââ¬Å"schoolââ¬Â, I had to be the moderate or teacher when they were able to be the doctor or principal. It made me sapidity like I was second best compared to them and I donââ¬â¢t think any little girl should feel the way I used to feel. Every child should feel like they can become whatever he or she wants and should not limit themselves because of the gender roles many are taught as a child. graphic symbol: http://www. newsweek. com/2010/09/22/why-family-films-are-so-sexist. ht ml\r\n'
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment