The Moon Hoax Essay -- Publicity Stunt Media

The lunation Hoax has been around since 1835, when the New York Sun printed an clause about this whole ordeal. The New York Sun used and credited Sir bath Herschel, who was a British Astronomer. Herschel claimed that he had tried out a new-fashi one and only(a)d type of telescope on the Cape of Good Hope in January of 1834. While in Cape Town, he verbalize hed set up an Observatory. Using this, he claimed to have observed what he thought of as the Real moonlight. He claimed to have seen vegetation, bodies of water, and living creatures. He also said he had seen Bat People who were described as being haired winged men. This took the People at a shock, and the Evidence and science amaze them. So many began to believe this is true. Today, there is still talk of this dream Hoax. There are many things that one can articulate doesnt make sense about the whole idea of landing on the moon. Most astronauts that have landed on the moon have brought fanny samples of a type of Luna r throw off. According to Dr. Sten Odenwald, we have accumulated at least 841.6 pounds of moon rock.. ?moonshine Hoax? Believers say that this Moon thrill could be any thing, and that if you take an unfamiliar type of rock, and call it a Moon Rock, people are going to believe it. There is one major problem with this theory. ?Dr. David McKay of NASAs Johnson Space Center says that faking a Moon rock to fool scientists around the world would be next to impossible. ?It would be furthest easier to just go to the Moon and get one? he says.? (2)Moon Rocks have been tested, and tested, and tested. Each time scientists have found many incompatible minerals in Moon Rocks that aren?t in Earth rocks. Earth rocks rent many ashes minerals, which is exactly what Moon Rocks don?t have, clay minerals. In the... ....astronomycafe.net/qadir/q1019.html. This site is a undecomposed source because it?s a recollection of common known data.4. Percy, David, and Mary Bennett. The Faked Apollo Landi ngs. 15 Oct. 2007 http//www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/cosmicapollo.html. This site is non a substantially source because it uses doctored and biased pictures and arguments to prove its points. 5. Phillips, Dr. Tony. The Great Moon Hoax. Science Nasa. NASAs Marshall Space Flight Center. 15 Oct. 2007 http//science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast23feb_2.htm. This is a good source because it was written my a team of space and engineering specialists.6. The Moon3 Exploring the Moon. The Worlds of David Darling. 15 Oct. 2007 http//www.daviddarling.info/childrens_encyclopedia/Moon_Chapter3.htmlThis site is a good source because it?s information can be backed up with other good sources.