Friday, March 1, 2019
Executive Summary for Cookie Business
No. 06 Determining wet effectiveness of white potato tuber electric cells the weighing method If a countersink cell is in equilibrium with an external firmness of purpose of such a tightfistedness that there is not net loss or gain of pissing, the water emf of the external solution will be equal to the water potential of the cell. Use of this fact can be made in estimating the water potential of a plant tissue. Samples of tissue are immersed in a range of external solutions of polar strengths. The solution that induces neither an improver nor a decrease in the volume or mussiness of the tissue has the same water potential as that of the cells in the tissue.The cells to be investigated in this experiment are those of the potato tuber. Changes in circle will be used as an indication of whether the cells are taking up or losing water. Procedure 1. Label six specimen tubes distilled water, 0. 1, 0. 2, 0. 3, 0. 4, 0. 5 mol dm-3. power approximately one third of a tube of dis tilled water in the first, and an equal volume of individually of a series of sucrose solutions of different strengths and (molarities) in the remainder. Each tube should be firmly stoppered. 2. Using a cork borer and a razor blade, prepare six unharmed piston chambers of potato.Each cylinder should be approximately 10mm in diameter and 12mm long. Slice up severally cylinder into six discs of approximately equal thickness. Place each group of discs on a separate valet of filter paper. 3. beseech each group of discs. (In each case weigh them on the piece of filter paper alone, and subtract the one from the other to get the flock of the discs). Record the mass of each group. 4. Put one group of discs into each of the labelled tubes and as you add each group, record its mass. Stopper the latter(prenominal) firmly and leave for not less than 24 hours. 5.After about 24 hours remove the discs from each tube. Remove any surplus fluid from them chop-chop and gently with filter paper, using the standardised procedure for all of them. thence re-weigh them. Record the new mass of each group of discs. 6. Graph you r results by plotting the circumstances sort in mass (change in mass multiplied by 100 divided by original mass) against the meter of the sucrose solutions. The latter, being the independent variable, should be on the horizontal axis the former on the vertical axis. 7. Calculate the water potential of the potato cells as follows.Find the point on your graph corresponding to a percentage mass change of zero. The molarity of sucrose corresponding to this zero mass change can now be read from the horizontal axis. From remit 4. 1 find the water potential of a sucrose solution of that molarity. That is the water potential of your sample of potato cells. Express your result in a kPa. For consideration 1. Criticise this method of finding the water potential of plant cells. How might it be improved? 2. What was the reason for dividing each cylinder into six discs, and why was it necessary to standardise the procedure for drying the discs? . With what kind of plant tissue might it be possible to use a change in volume rather than mass for estimating the water potential? 4. How does the shelter of the water potential differ from the osmotic potential of the solution in the vacuole? 5. In constructing your graph did you join up the points with straight lines or nevertheless a smooth curve? Justify whichever technique you used. Molarity (mol dm) osmotic potential kPa 0. 5 -130 0. 10 -260 0. 15 -410 0. 20 -540 0. 5 -680 0. 30 -860 0. 35 -970 0. 40 -1120 0. 45 -1280 0. 0 -1450 0. 55 -1620 0. 60 -1800 0. 65 -1980 0. 0 -2180 0. 75 -2370 0. 80 -2580 0. 85 -2790 0. 0 -3000 0. 95 -3250 1. 00 -3500 Table4. 1 Relationship between molarity and osmotic potential of sucrose solutions
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment