Allegory of the Cave and Narrator Essay Example for Free

onlyegory of the Cave and Narrator EssayAs the philospoher Seneca once said, It is the power of the mind to be unconquerable. Raymond tenders Cathedral is a story virtually a man who started out as a closed-minded man just, throughout the story his event changes as he begins to bond with his wifes friend, Robert, a man who is blind. Platos Allegory of the cave is a story about a captive who is freed from being locked in chains existent all of his life underground and finding out a different perspective about a falsehood hes been living his whole life, being told as a conversation between Socrates and Glaucon. In the stories, Cathedral by Raymond cutter, and Allegory of the Cave by Plato, twain authors argue that a persons earthly concern is not al focussings what is seems to be. In Cathedral, Raymond Carver uses irony between the narrator and Robert when they talk about the cathedral. The narrator tries to explain how a cathedral looks similar with terminology w hen he says To begin with, theyre in truth tall. I was looking around the room for clues. They dig commission up. Up and up. Toward the sky. Theyre so big, some of them, they feature to have these supports.To help hold them up, so to speak to Robert who is blind and cant genuinely apprehend what is being said. (Carver, page 24, lines 448-451). Until Robert asks to be drawn a cathedral when he says Hey, listen to me. Will you do me a favor? I got an idea. why dont you find us a pen and some heavy paper. Go on, bub, get the stuff the narrator realizes that Robert sees by touching around the paper. (Carver, page 25, lines 492-495). What the narrator doesnt understand is that the blind man cant see what he sees even though he thinks that by describing with words about how a cathedral looks, helps.The irony Carver is trying to show is that the narrator is the one who is blind, not Robert, because he perceives his truth to be similar to Roberts but instead really isnt. In Allegory of the cave Plato uses metaphor about the message that is being comp ared to an imaginary prisoners life. Socrates explains to Glaucon Behold Human beings living in a underground cave, which has a mouth open towards the light and reaching all on the cave here they have been from their childhood, and have their legs and bed chained so that they cannot move, and can only see before them, being prevented by the chains from turing round their heads.Above and behind them a fire is fulgurous at a distance, and between the fire and the prisoners there is a raised way and you give see, if you look, a low wall built along the way, like the screen which marionette players have in front of them, over which they show the puppets to imagine a person who is living a certain kind of way for a long period of time. (Plato, page 8, lines 5-14). Then they are told that what they are living is a lie when Socrates says And now look again, and see what leave behind naturally follow if the prison ers are released and disabused of their error.At first, when any of them is liberated and compelled suddenly to stand up and turn his neck round and wlak and look towards the light, he allow for suffer sharp pains the glare will distrees him, and he will be unable to see the realities of which in his former state he had seen the shadows and and so conceive some one saying to him, that what he saw before was an illusion, but that now, when he is approaching nearer to being and his eye is turned towards to a greater extent real existence, he has a clearer vision, -what will be his reply? (Plato, pages 8-9. Lines 42-51). Socrates then says And if he is compelled to look straight at the light, will he not have a pain in his eyes which will make him turn away and take in the objects of vision which he can see, and which he will conceive to be in reality clearer than the things which are now being shown to him to explain that the prisoner will want to believe what he is already habitu ate not to what has just been told to him. (Plato, page, lines 57-61).The metaphor that the story compares to is a prisoners life and perspective of reality, once you are told that the way you have been living for your whole life is wrong, you are most likely to be scared of the truth that has just been told to you since the reality that you have been living isnt what it seems to be. In both stories, Cathedral by Raymond Carver and Allegory of the cave by Plato, both authors use imaging to descibe how the characters in the story are lead to a new reality that has been bestow upon them.In Cathedral the narrator learns the way Robert sees things when he says He ran his fingers over the paper. He went up and down the sides of the paper. The edges, even the edges. He fingered the corners. All right, he said. All right, lets do her. He found my hand with the pen. He closed his hand over my hand. Go ahead, bub, draw, he said. Draw. Youll see. Ill follow along with you.Itll be okay. J ust begin now like Im telling you. Youll see. Draw, the blind man said. (Carver, page 26, lines 508-514). Carver reveals that by being very desciptive using imagery, the reader can understand how the narrator is getting really tense in a good way when he is shown that his perspective of reality of blind people just being blind and nothing else is about to change.In Allegory of the cave the prisoner is being taken to see a new perspective of the way he used to think when Socrates says And suppose once more, that he is reluctantly dragged up a steep and rugged ascent, and held immediate until hes forced into the presence of the sun himslef, is he not likely to be pained and irritated? When he approaches the light his eyes will be dazzled, and he will not be able to see anything at all of what are now called realities. (Plato, page 9, lines 63-68).Plato shows that by using imagery in his story, people can notice that the prisoner is in a lot of pain when he is being shown that his perspective of reality of the shadows being his reality is about to change for the rest of his life. In both stories Cathedral and Allegory of the cave both charcters of the story are being shown a different way of thinking. This new way of thinking evolved them into a better self being. Both charcters, the narrator and the prisoner were challeneged into a new way of thinking, both stuck to it till the end, and both became more of a fulfilled person.